From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933379AbXGLSwo (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:52:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756748AbXGLSwh (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:52:37 -0400 Received: from 216-99-217-87.dsl.aracnet.com ([216.99.217.87]:35756 "EHLO sous-sol.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756334AbXGLSwh (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:52:37 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:52:19 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Nish Aravamudan Cc: Greg KH , Andrew Morton , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.22.1 Message-ID: <20070712185219.GR4306@sequoia.sous-sol.org> References: <20070710200637.GA5881@kroah.com> <29495f1d0707121135u2a07cf04nb8bfe555c5c63679@mail.gmail.com> <20070712184106.GA22849@kroah.com> <29495f1d0707121146k7b3a7175l1fcb40877e59cfaf@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <29495f1d0707121146k7b3a7175l1fcb40877e59cfaf@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Nish Aravamudan (nish.aravamudan@gmail.com) wrote: > On 7/12/07, Greg KH wrote: > > That is a tree that Chris did, and I didn't realize we were maintaining > > it as the "official" stable tree, that is why it is not mentioned in the > > release notes :) > > Fair enough -- it's just a little bit easier from my side for > mirroring to only have to mirror one tree rather simply rather than > pulling multiple trees into one (and thus having to add to the list as > time goes on). > > > I'll let Chris decide if he wishes to maintain it or not, Chris? Nish, I think you might be the only user ;-) I never figured out a nice way to do this w/out having a coherency issue (well, triggers aside). Ideally git would allow for something more transparent than alternatives, actual moving view to another tree. It's possible with links, but that seems just dirty. Short of that, do folks find the tree useful? If so, I can work on some better automation to keep it up-to-date. thanks, -chris