From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] slob: improvements
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:45:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070713114532.07f9fd53.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070713183506.GN11115@waste.org>
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 13:35:06 -0500
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 11:27:25AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > Index: linux-2.6/init/Kconfig
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/init/Kconfig
> > > +++ linux-2.6/init/Kconfig
> > > @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ config SLUB
> > > way and has enhanced diagnostics.
> > >
> > > config SLOB
> > > - depends on EMBEDDED && !SPARSEMEM
> > > + depends on EMBEDDED && !SPARSEMEM && !ARCH_USES_SLAB_PAGE_STRUCT
> > > bool "SLOB (Simple Allocator)"
> > > help
> > > SLOB replaces the SLAB allocator with a drastically simpler
> >
> > Is this patch going in? I have a randconfig (2.6.22) with
> > CONFIG_SLOB=y
> > CONFIG_NUMA=y
> > CONFIG_SMP=y
> > The kernel build fails with these config symbols set like that.
> > It looks like SLOB needs that additional
> > && !ARCH_USES_SLAB_PAGE_STRUCT
> > (or && !SMP)
>
> I think Andrew intends to push it to 2.6.23, yes.
>
Yup.
I had to hunt for it though. Turns out I renamed the patch to
slob-rework-freelist-handling. Please don't give patches dopey titles like
"slob improvements".
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-13 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-15 8:43 Nick Piggin
2007-05-15 15:17 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-15 23:33 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-13 18:27 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-07-13 18:35 ` Matt Mackall
2007-07-13 18:45 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070713114532.07f9fd53.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome