From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764717AbXGPWLO (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:11:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754508AbXGPWK7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:10:59 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:35555 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759965AbXGPWK6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:10:58 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:00:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20070716.150057.59832795.davem@davemloft.net> To: jeremy@goop.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org, ak@suse.de Subject: Re: powerd in arch/sparc64/kernel/power.c From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <469BC777.5010207@goop.org> References: <469BC777.5010207@goop.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.52 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:31:03 -0700 > Hi Dave, > > I was about to submit the patch below for merging, but it obviously > conflicts with your change 13077d80286205e02eebe1c2786a914a4bbd2588 > ("[SPARC64]: Export powerd facilities for external entities.") which was > merged this morning. > > My patch makes orderly_poweroff() a globally-common function to generate > a user-level poweroff event, and it basically a superset of powerd. > Should I drop the sparc parts of this patch, or would you be OK with > dropping powerd? Put the generic code in and I'll try to make use of it in sparc64. I have two spots that need it now.