From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764289AbXGPPRx (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:17:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756323AbXGPPRq (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:17:46 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:43256 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755163AbXGPPRp (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:17:45 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Alan Stern Subject: Re: Hibernation considerations Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:25:15 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Nigel Cunningham , david@lang.hm, LKML , Andrew Morton , "Eric W. Biederman" , "Huang, Ying" , Jeremy Maitin-Shepard , Kyle Moffett , Pavel Machek , pm list , Al Boldi References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200707161725.16593.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, 16 July 2007 16:15, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > > > As I understand it, running a different OS between the hibernate and > > > the resume would violate the ACPI spec. > > > > Well then, I know one or two people who would argue that the ACPI spec is > > faulty. :\ > > It's hard to argue against that. In fact there are people who would > argue that the ACPI spec is incomplete and inconsistent period, > regardless of any questions about what happens between hibernate and > resume. :-) That's true, but OTOH it's difficult to argue with my notebook's firmware about that. ;-) Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth