Re: raid5:md3: read error corrected , followed by , Machine Check Exception: .

[Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>]

On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 07:32:38PM -0700, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> >So your disk throws a fit
> 
> 	Actually it's brand new .  Infant mortallity ?  I at least have a 
> 	cold spare available .  So Yes I am replacing that puppy .  I'll drop it 
> into another system & give it the format command & see how much the user 
> bad block table grows .  I'll bet I'll get a table full overflow on it .

Manually keep both tables under supervision. I'd guess that if you
send it a format, it will update the factory table (and move the user
bad block table there). 

But most will retry writing to the bad sectors. And with a fully-fresh
copy of the data, it will still be readable, and the blocks will be
marked as ready-for-use, because that's better for performance....

> >And at some point at least 18 minutes after the raid incident you log
> >CPU problems.
> 
> 	I didn't notice the 18 Minute differance .  Drats .

I'm not sure how this happened, but the disk errror messages seem to have
been logged by syslog, and the MCEs seem to have been copied from the 
console: They don't have the date attached....?

	Roger.
-- 
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
**    Delftechpark 26 2628 XH  Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233    **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement. 
Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific! 
Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ