From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761352AbXGPUdT (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:33:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754688AbXGPUdF (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:33:05 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]:39366 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751996AbXGPUdC (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:33:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:05:40 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Roland Dreier Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, general@lists.openfabrics.org Subject: Re: Further 2.6.23 merge plans... Message-ID: <20070716200540.GA8527@mellanox.co.il> Reply-To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" References: <20070713054711.GA21709@mellanox.co.il> <20070714175425.GA17597@mellanox.co.il> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Quoting Roland Dreier : > Subject: Re: Further 2.6.23 merge plans... > > > > I haven't done any work on it or seen anything from anyone else, so I > > > expect this will have to wait for 2.6.24. > > > I'm surprised to hear this. How about this: > > http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2007-May/035757.html > > Sure, I remember that. But I haven't seen anything to suggest that > anyone has given any further thought to the issues that were raised in > that thread. Well, the only issue I recall is about the # of EQs we want to allocate. Was there something else? Maybe code can be merged as-is (2 EQs) and the number be tuned later as applications start using vectors? -- MST