From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755525AbXGQLML (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:12:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754579AbXGQLL6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:11:58 -0400 Received: from smtp-102-tuesday.noc.nerim.net ([62.4.17.102]:2907 "EHLO mallaury.nerim.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752342AbXGQLL6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:11:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:12:55 +0200 From: Jean Delvare To: Greg KH Cc: Tejun Heo , LKML Subject: Re: sysfs root link count broken in 2.6.22-git5 Message-ID: <20070717131255.71b7e72e@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20070717034844.GB11602@suse.de> References: <20070715124232.4e371bf9@hyperion.delvare> <20070717034844.GB11602@suse.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.5 (GTK+ 2.10.6; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:48:44 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:42:32PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > I'm running 2.6.22-git5 and noticed that the link count of the sysfs > > root is broken: > > > > $ ls -ld /sys > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jul 15 12:27 /sys > > > > sysfs is mounted, the link count should be 11, and is with kernel > > 2.6.22.1. find(1) complains about the bad link count. > > I suggest updating your version of find(1), I get no such complaint > with: > $ find --version > GNU find version 4.3.8 > Built using GNU gnulib version 2007-05-26 > Features enabled: D_TYPE O_NOFOLLOW(enabled) LEAF_OPTIMISATION FTS() CBO(level=0) > > What are you using? $ find --version GNU find version 4.2.28 Features enabled: D_TYPE O_NOFOLLOW(enabled) LEAF_OPTIMISATION This is the standard version in openSuse 10.2. But how does it matter? sysfs is broken, not find(1). Don't you see the sysfs root link count at 2 as I do? This needs to be fixed. -- Jean Delvare