From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934443AbXGQRHk (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:07:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1765736AbXGQRHU (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:07:20 -0400 Received: from mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE ([134.130.7.73]:56193 "EHLO mta-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764665AbXGQRHR (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:07:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:00:48 +0200 From: markus reichelt Subject: Re: ck1 patches for 2.6.22 and 2.6.20 In-reply-to: To: LKML Mail-followup-to: LKML Message-id: <20070717170048.GA8435@tatooine.rebelbase.local> Organization: still stuck in reorganization mode MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-disposition: inline X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.16,546,1175464800"; d="scan'208";a="9767717" X-PGP-Key: 0xC2A3FEE4 X-PGP-Fingerprint: FFB8 E22F D2BC 0488 3D56 F672 2CCC 933B C2A3 FEE4 X-Request-PGP: http://mareichelt.de/keys/c2a3fee4.asc References: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * "Ni@m" wrote: > Does -ck1 patches for 2.6.22 and 2.6.20 make the same job? Or it's > better to backport -ck1 for 2.6.22 to 2.6.20? fyi, http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.ck/7850 --=20 left blank, right bald --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGnPXALMyTO8Kj/uQRAsBZAJ9/sO+VBpJeRYjQjevT4cF+kp4xsgCfWWI9 OPk2GGFta00TSmibPPrGwxQ= =E74e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--