From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934624AbXGQTVa (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:21:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757369AbXGQTVV (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:21:21 -0400 Received: from waste.org ([66.93.16.53]:41209 "EHLO waste.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755617AbXGQTVU (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:21:20 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:21:01 -0500 From: Matt Mackall To: Andrew Morton Cc: Lindsay Roberts , LKML , celinux-dev@tree.celinuxforum.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Add romfs version 2 Message-ID: <20070717192100.GE11166@waste.org> References: <8734b7880707122301m400294d4nf12072f949c95fa4@mail.gmail.com> <20070717013635.d6d0b124.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070717013635.d6d0b124.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 01:36:35AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:01:48 +1000 "Lindsay Roberts" wrote: > > > * Increases romfs partition size limit from 2GB to 4GB. That seems worthwhile. > > * Adds new derivative of romfs filesystem (rom2fs) with > > block aligned regular file data to bring performance > > parity with ext2/3. This is about 225% of the read > > speed of the existing romfs. Doesn't that make these filesystems much bigger? By, on average, .5k per file? Or, if I'm understanding things correctly, ~1k? -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.