From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934166AbXGRXGS (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:06:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755889AbXGRXGE (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:06:04 -0400 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:47009 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756473AbXGRXGD (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:06:03 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:05:55 -0400 To: Andrew Morton Cc: NeilBrown , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [NFS] [PATCH 013 of 20] knfsd: nfsd: factor out code from show_expflags Message-ID: <20070718230555.GN7111@fieldses.org> References: <20070710121949.12548.patches@notabene> <1070710022737.13509@suse.de> <20070713002933.f15724a7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070713002933.f15724a7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) From: "J. Bruce Fields" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 12:29:33AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:27:37 +1000 NeilBrown wrote: > > > +static void exp_flags(struct seq_file *m, int flag, int fsid, > > + uid_t anonu, uid_t anong, struct nfsd4_fs_locations *fsloc) > > +{ > > + show_expflags(m, flag, NFSEXP_ALLFLAGS); > > if (flag & NFSEXP_FSID) > > - seq_printf(m, "%sfsid=%d", first++?",":"", fsid); > > + seq_printf(m, ",fsid=%d", fsid); > > if (anonu != (uid_t)-2 && anonu != (0x10000-2)) > > - seq_printf(m, "%sanonuid=%d", first++?",":"", anonu); > > + seq_printf(m, ",sanonuid=%d", anonu); > > It's a bit presumptuous to print a uid_t with "%d". Fortunately it > will work OK with all the present architectures. > > But in general: be cautious when feeding opaque types to printk. OK, here I'm still confused--what should we be doing instead? --b.