mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>,
	lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] i386: use x86_64's desc_def.h
Date: 19 Jul 2007 02:00:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:00:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070719000026.GA29650@muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1184801261.10380.174.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:27:41AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 09:19 -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> > > +#define GET_CONTENTS(desc)	(((desc)->raw32.b >> 10) & 3)
> > > +#define GET_WRITABLE(desc)	(((desc)->raw32.b >>  9) & 1)
> > 
> > You got rid of the duplicate definitions here, but then added new 
> > duplicates (GET_CONTENTS / WRITABLE).  Can you stick them in desc.h?
> 
> To be honest, I got sick of counting bits at this point, and didn't want
> to introduce bugs.

Where is 1/ and 3/ ?

I got an older version of this patch queued now

-Andi

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-07-19  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-18  7:22 [PATCH 1/3] Standardize x86_64's desc_defs.h in preparation for exposure to i386 Rusty Russell
2007-07-18  7:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] i386: use x86_64's desc_def.h Rusty Russell
2007-07-18  7:30   ` [PATCH 3/3] i386: Replace struct Xgt_desc_struct with struct desc_ptr Rusty Russell
2007-07-21  1:33     ` Chris Wright
2007-07-18 16:19   ` [PATCH 2/3] i386: use x86_64's desc_def.h Zachary Amsden
2007-07-18 23:27     ` Rusty Russell
2007-07-18 23:29       ` Rusty Russell
2007-07-21  1:32         ` Chris Wright
2007-07-19  0:00       ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-07-18  9:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] Standardize x86_64's desc_defs.h in preparation for exposure to i386 Andi Kleen
2007-07-18 11:44   ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070719000026.GA29650@muc.de \
    --to=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=zach@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome