From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S939767AbXGSQWA (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:22:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S936011AbXGSQVq (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:21:46 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:56149 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935991AbXGSQVo (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:21:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:21:14 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , stable@kernel.org, Greg KH , Chris Wright , Jens Axboe , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Jan Glauber , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [patch] sched: implement cpu_clock(cpu) high-speed time source, take #2 Message-ID: <20070719162114.GA6154@elte.hu> References: <469F793E.6030006@goop.org> <20070719145058.GA11971@elte.hu> <469F7D7A.204@goop.org> <20070719150955.GA19373@elte.hu> <469F8179.2060802@goop.org> <20070719154254.GA24225@elte.hu> <20070719154449.GA28998@elte.hu> <469F8D28.1010304@goop.org> <20070719161643.GA5153@elte.hu> <469F8EBE.5020703@goop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <469F8EBE.5020703@goop.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7-deb -1.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > yeah, that's the idea. > > Good. But the real question: does it help Andrew? that's still an important question, but these changes are still needed nevertheless, to unbreak softlockup.c ... I havent been watching while doing CFS :-/ Ingo