From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935133AbXGUCji (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:39:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760082AbXGUCj2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:39:28 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:32934 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759062AbXGUCj1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:39:27 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:39:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20070720.193926.92584343.davem@davemloft.net> To: kaber@trash.net Cc: nix.or.die@googlemail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: net/ipv4/inetpeer.c stack warnings From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <469F5DBB.3080106@trash.net> References: <469F5941.7090900@googlemail.com> <469F5DBB.3080106@trash.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.52 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Patrick McHardy Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:48:59 +0200 > Gabriel C wrote: > > Hello , > > > > I noticed on current git this warning in net/ipv4/inetpeer.c > > Yeah, I have no idea why the gcc people thought that this was > something worth warning about. Especially since explicitly > checking for != NULL silences the warning again. Sigh, applied :-)