From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933277AbXGTHR7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 03:17:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759613AbXGTHRv (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 03:17:51 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:48126 "EHLO mail.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759243AbXGTHRu (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 03:17:50 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:17:42 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Satyam Sharma Cc: Christoph Hellwig , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] kill DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED Message-ID: <20070720071742.GB25717@lst.de> References: <20070719211135.GA32725@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: -0.001 () BAYES_44 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:58:34AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > That comment in libusual is quite nonsensical, IMHO. Note that > usu_init_notify is declared as DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED and yet the > author wants us to believe (later, when he's doing that dummy Given that no one should use libusual and we should kill it and the abomination called ub I don't really care about fixing this up.