From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934464AbXGWTfn (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:35:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934447AbXGWTeM (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:34:12 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:56576 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934399AbXGWTeK (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:34:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:34:08 -0700 From: Christoph Lameter To: "Siddha, Suresh B" Cc: ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, travis@sgi.com, Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: x86: Convert cpu_core_map to be a per cpu variable Message-ID: <20070723123408.618ea0a3@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20070717192718.GF3318@linux-os.sc.intel.com> References: <20070717192718.GF3318@linux-os.sc.intel.com> Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.10.0 (GTK+ 2.10.13; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:27:18 -0700 "Siddha, Suresh B" wrote: > Is there a reason why cpu_sibling_map[] is left out in these changes? Yes this patch is a trial balloon to make sure that I/we do the right thing when dealing with the other cpu maps. Patchset will hopefully soon be forthcoming (after I have dealt with the pile of emails/issues that came in during my vacation). I'd be glad if someone else could do it??? Hopefully yours, C