From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765705AbXGYP1R (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:27:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758054AbXGYP1I (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:27:08 -0400 Received: from mout0.freenet.de ([195.4.92.90]:36906 "EHLO mout0.freenet.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757044AbXGYP1H (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:27:07 -0400 From: Karsten Wiese To: John Sigler Subject: Re: Pin-pointing the root of unusual application latencies Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:28:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <469600F7.3060603@free.fr> <20070725133835.GA17616@elte.hu> <46A758B5.9070602@free.fr> In-Reply-To: <46A758B5.9070602@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200707251728.00207.fzu@wemgehoertderstaat.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2007 schrieb John Sigler: > > Is there some form of priority inheritance? Does the IRQ handler get a > priority boost if a high priority task is waiting for it? No. But that would be "nice to have". Karsten