From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964868AbXGZSgd (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:36:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934442AbXGZSgU (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:36:20 -0400 Received: from yue.linux-ipv6.org ([203.178.140.15]:49329 "EHLO yue.st-paulia.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934429AbXGZSgS (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:36:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:37:10 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <20070726.133710.12677267.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> To: davem@davemloft.net Cc: djohnson+linux-kernel@sw.starentnetworks.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, sakkiped@starentnetworks.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: ipv6_addr_type() doesn't know about RFC4193 addresses From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= In-Reply-To: <20070725.171203.102545287.davem@davemloft.net> References: <18087.57717.495366.413571@zeus.sw.starentnetworks.com> <20070725.171203.102545287.davem@davemloft.net> Organization: USAGI/WIDE Project X-URL: http://www.yoshifuji.org/%7Ehideaki/ X-Fingerprint: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA X-PGP-Key-URL: http://www.yoshifuji.org/%7Ehideaki/hideaki@yoshifuji.org.asc X-Face: "5$Al-.M>NJ%a'@hhZdQm:."qn~PA^gq4o*>iCFToq*bAi#4FRtx}enhuQKz7fNqQz\BYU] $~O_5m-9'}MIs`XGwIEscw;e5b>n"B_?j/AkL~i/MEaZBLP X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1 (AOI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <20070725.171203.102545287.davem@davemloft.net> (at Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:12:03 -0700 (PDT)), David Miller says: > Contrarily, there may be ipv6_addr_type() call sites that really > do want to reject rfc4193 addresses. I do not think we have such users. --yoshfuji