mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bbpetkov@yahoo.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Xudong Guan <xudong.guan@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found...
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 18:30:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070726163053.GA4570@gollum.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46A8BB6C.6050903@zytor.com>

On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:19:08AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Xudong Guan wrote:
> > On 13:26(+0200) Tue 24 Jul, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >>    2.6.23-rc1 won't boot on my Asus M6N laptop and the last thing it shows after loading
> >> grub is "No setup signature found...," which, imho, comes from
> >> arch/i386/boot/header.S. I tried printing out the value of setup_sig like so
> > 
> > I hitted the same error message with v2.6.23-rc1-171-ge4903fb.
> > No problem with v2.6.21-3770-g01e73be.
> > Seems there has been some cleanup of the i386/boot code.
> > Anyone can give a quick clue, or should I do a bisect?

I just finished bisecting between v2.6.22..v2.6.23-rc1 (13 kernels compiled, whew...) and Peter you are
right, here's the evidoer:

4fd06960f120e02e9abc802a09f9511c400042a5 is first bad commit
commit 4fd06960f120e02e9abc802a09f9511c400042a5
Author: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Date:   Wed Jul 11 12:18:56 2007 -0700

    Use the new x86 setup code for i386

    This patch hooks the new x86 setup code into the Makefile machinery.  It
    also adapts boot/tools/build.c to a two-file (as opposed to three-file)
    universe, and simplifies it substantially.

    Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
    Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

:040000 040000 6560eb5b7e40d93813276544bced8c478f9067f5 fe5f90d9ca08e526559815789175602ba2c51743 M      arch

> The bisect will almost guaranteed show a change at the change to the new
> setup code.  The message means that the setup code wasn't loaded
> correctly into memory; the big question is *why*.

> What distro/version of grub are you running?  
Debian unstable
> I'm wondering if there are
> some old version of grub out there which did the "load four sectors"
> way-anciently-obsolete crap; the other possibility that comes to mind is
> setting up the stack in an invalid manner.
grub version:

[boris@gollum:18:17:27:->  apt-cache show grub
Package: grub
Priority: optional
Section: admin
Installed-Size: 708
Maintainer: Grub Maintainers <pkg-grub-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Architecture: i386
Version: 0.97-29
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.5-5), libncurses5 (>= 5.4-5)
Suggests: grub-doc, mdadm
Filename: pool/main/g/grub/grub_0.97-29_i386.deb
Size: 366884
MD5sum: 2da7a5942db06eaba046dff4615bcce9
SHA1: 7f4da793da209d011ce94fceebaebe0e5f08790f
SHA256: 2596782c08f1f7365e9935f687fef74c67d8702503188f22448db9f0ac98e18e
Description: GRand Unified Bootloader
...

so any ideas/test patches for debugging this are welcome.

-- 
Regards/Gruß,
    Boris.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-07-26 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-24 11:26 Borislav Petkov
2007-07-26 15:08 ` Xudong Guan
2007-07-26 15:19   ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-26 15:26     ` Xudong Guan
2007-07-26 15:43       ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]       ` <46A8C7BA.3040008@zytor.com>
     [not found]         ` <20070726162439.GA13387@xguan-laptop>
     [not found]           ` <46A8CB3F.7040207@zytor.com>
     [not found]             ` <20070726171609.GA16236@xguan-laptop>
2007-07-26 17:55               ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-26 16:30     ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2007-07-26 16:36       ` Xudong Guan
2007-07-26 16:59         ` Borislav Petkov
2007-07-26 17:09           ` Xudong Guan
2007-07-26 18:12       ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-27  1:36         ` Borislav Petkov
2007-07-27  4:31           ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-27 15:51             ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-07-29  8:51             ` Borislav Petkov
2007-07-29  9:24               ` Xudong Guan
2007-07-29 10:37                 ` Borislav Petkov
2007-07-29 13:50                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-29 19:15                     ` Borislav Petkov
2007-07-30 14:05                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-30 18:53                         ` Borislav Petkov
2007-07-30 20:46                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-01  4:38                             ` Borislav Petkov
2007-08-01 12:41                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-01 14:36                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-02  5:13                                 ` 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found... SOLVED! Borislav Petkov
2007-08-02 17:41                                   ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070726163053.GA4570@gollum.tnic \
    --to=bbpetkov@yahoo.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xudong.guan@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®