From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932574AbXG0FOA (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:14:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753256AbXG0FNv (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:13:51 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:59896 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753254AbXG0FNt (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:13:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:13:07 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Joe Jin Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gurudas.pai@oracle.com, wen.gang.wang@oracle.com, Badari Pulavarty , Zach Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] add check do_direct_IO() return val Message-Id: <20070726221307.3d7b3446.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070726090400.GA18640@joejin-pc.cn.oracle.com> References: <20070726090400.GA18640@joejin-pc.cn.oracle.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:04:00 +0800 Joe Jin wrote: > This is the patch for check do_direct_IO() return val. > > At do_direct_IO(), sometimes dio_get_page() will return -EFAULT/-ENOMEM, > according to orig source, it will go on left work. buf for dio_get_page() > return a error will made many useful member of dio not initialized like > dio->map_bh and others, at this point, kernel will panic. > > Signed-off-by: Joe Jin > > > --- > --- linux-2.6.22/fs/direct-io.c.orig 2007-07-26 11:32:27.000000000 +0800 > +++ linux-2.6.22/fs/direct-io.c 2007-07-26 11:33:58.000000000 +0800 > @@ -1031,7 +1031,9 @@ direct_io_worker(int rw, struct kiocb *i > ((dio->final_block_in_request - dio->block_in_file) << > blkbits); > > - if (ret) { > + if (ret == -EFAULT || ret == -ENOMEM) > + goto out; > + else if (ret) { > dio_cleanup(dio); > break; > } > @@ -1113,6 +1115,7 @@ direct_io_worker(int rw, struct kiocb *i > } else > BUG_ON(ret != -EIOCBQUEUED); > > +out: > return ret; > } > I think we still want to run dio_cleanup() if do_direct_IO() failed? Otherwise we can leak pages. And there's nothing special about EFAULT or ENOMEM here: if do_direct_IO() returns any error then that's it: we bale out, yes? In fact I'm suspecting that this is what the code in there used to do. Something like: for (...) { ... ret = do_direct_IO(...); ... if (ret) { dio_dleanup(dio); break } } return ret; but then someone later came along and added more code between the end of the for loop and the `return' statement. yep, that's exactly what happened. We broke it in the 2.5.45 release back in October 2002. (Where "we" == "Badari") So I think what we need to do is something close to this: --- a/fs/direct-io.c~add-check-do_direct_io-return-val +++ a/fs/direct-io.c @@ -1033,7 +1033,7 @@ direct_io_worker(int rw, struct kiocb *i if (ret) { dio_cleanup(dio); - break; + goto out; } } /* end iovec loop */ @@ -1112,7 +1112,7 @@ direct_io_worker(int rw, struct kiocb *i kfree(dio); } else BUG_ON(ret != -EIOCBQUEUED); - +out: return ret; } _ However I'd like to ask you guys to carefully review and test that please.