From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761175AbXG2IwQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 04:52:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760519AbXG2IwD (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 04:52:03 -0400 Received: from smtp107.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com ([69.147.102.70]:41537 "HELO smtp107.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1760316AbXG2IwB (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 04:52:01 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:User-Agent; b=EOXJFoVlsd2//MzrzExg/kgAhcHEJwjEs+LFu8KrYPQQQwqEIfUZ6e3VleORyENpwEunUbMg0R80E138unDx65zaqe8w6dDXlyZX7B/SIFRnQjaVQNmWPny8g/mKcoyosR/Wt73SOL0Ih8qKAs0gzl/Ak+PitnI69CgDU95BPuE= ; X-YMail-OSG: Hv9tzm0VM1kSY5z1.bJtnylsLZrHObBsOIDvaG6vkgFFDNgnKt.IC3Fe.UVL_KVpELevrFcZoA-- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 10:51:00 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Xudong Guan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chuck Ebbert Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found... Message-ID: <20070729085059.GA10758@gollum.tnic> Reply-To: bbpetkov@yahoo.de References: <20070724112618.GA4431@gollum.tnic> <20070726150854.GA7034@xguan-laptop> <46A8BB6C.6050903@zytor.com> <20070726163053.GA4570@gollum.tnic> <46A8E3F9.5070809@zytor.com> <20070727013615.GC4570@gollum.tnic> <46A9753A.1010206@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <46A9753A.1010206@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:31:54PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: [added to cc: Chuck Ebbert] > Borislav Petkov wrote: > >> > >> The absolute best would be if we could replicate this in simulation > >> (Bochs or Qemu); this would make it very simple to debug. Would you be > >> willing to try to do that? > > sure, will do, however i'll be busy at work/travelling tomorrow but as soon as i > > get home i'll whip up my qemu and run the kernel in question in it. However, > > Xudong said that grub 0.97 boots just fine on his machine and i think it'll be > > better to debug this right on the bare hardware (i.e. my laptop) ...? > > Suggestions ? > > If we can't reproduce the problem in simulation, that itself will tell > us something very important. If we *can* reproduce it in simulation, it > will be vastly easier to debug. Hi Peter, sorry for the delay, here's my report. I got the qemu linux image from the qemu website and did the following: [boris@gollum:10:34:25:qemu:9553)-> qemu -kernel /boot/2.6.22-4fd06960f120e02e9abc802a09f9511c400042a5-12 -append "root=/dev/hda" linux-0.2.img and the kernel did boot just fine so the problem should be pertaining only to the case when we boot on the bare hardware... -- Regards/Gruß, Boris.