From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762606AbXG2Mbu (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 08:31:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760615AbXG2Mbm (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 08:31:42 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:49367 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759573AbXG2Mbl (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 08:31:41 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:31:20 +0100 From: Russell King To: Christoph Hellwig , Adrian Bunk , spyro@f2s.com, john@dnsworld.co.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: Remove the arm26 port Message-ID: <20070729123119.GA25431@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20070707201208.GJ3492@stusta.de> <20070729115040.GD30976@stusta.de> <20070729121012.GA1375@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070729121012.GA1375@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 01:10:12PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 01:50:40PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Considering the state of the arm26 port, I do hereby suggest to remove > > it from the Linx kernel since it's far from a usable state and doesn't > > seem to come back into a usable state. > > > > If anyone wants to work on getting this port back into a usable state in > > the forseeable future he should speak up now. > > Yes, please. This bitrotting code has been in the way for quite bit of > cross-architecture work I've been doing. > > Btw, there's probably no point to Cc rmk as he's not involved with that > stinkin' pile. Definitely - I'd like to see it gone so hopefully I'll stop being copied on every single janitorial change to it. (And yes, I've re-enabled mail-followup-to since otherwise I can't group-reply in mutt to everyone - without it I just get hch in the To: header and an empty CC: with 'g'. Tough shit to those anti-mail-followup-to people. It's the only thing that actually works.) -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: