From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S968203AbXG3UK1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:10:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763973AbXG3UKL (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:10:11 -0400 Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:48789 "EHLO agminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763715AbXG3UKK (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:10:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:13:02 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: Satyam Sharma Cc: "John W. Linville" , Matthias Kaehlcke , Michael Buesch , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Use mutex instead of semaphore in the Host AP driver Message-Id: <20070730131302.82622b06.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20070729212909.GC3432@traven> <20070729213434.GD3432@traven> <200707300006.42397.mb@bu3sch.de> <20070730054004.GI3432@traven> <20070730145005.GB6586@tuxdriver.com> Organization: Oracle Linux Eng. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.2 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 01:44:37 +0530 (IST) Satyam Sharma wrote: > > > On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, John W. Linville wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 12:50:31PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > > On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > > > > > > [...] > > > > The Host AP driver uses a semaphore as mutex. Use the mutex API > > > > instead of the (binary) semaphore. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Satyam Sharma > > > > Is that the same as Acked-by? Or do you disagree with the patch? > > > > Just checkin'... > > Well, I'm not the maintainer, so didn't think correct to give an > "Acked-by". "Reviewed-by" generally means I read the patch, and think > it is correct. Probably could save time for others ... You should use Acked-by. See Documentation/SubmittingPatches. :) --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***