mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Sipek <jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
To: Hans-Peter Jansen <hpj@urpla.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 12/26] ext2 white-out support
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 07:43:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070801114320.GA13223@filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708011200.44093.hpj@urpla.net>

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 12:00:42PM +0200, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 31. Juli 2007 19:00 schrieb Jan Blunck:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, Josef Sipek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 06:13:35PM +0200, Jan Blunck wrote:
> > > > Introduce white-out support to ext2.
> > >
> > > I think storing whiteouts on the branches is wrong. It creates all sort
> > > of nasty cases when people actually try to use unioning. Imagine a
> > > (no-so unlikely) scenario where you have 2 unions, and they share a
> > > branch. If you create a whiteout in one union on that shared branch,
> > > the whiteout magically affects the other union as well! Whiteouts are a
> > > union-level construct, and therefore storing them at the branch level
> > > is wrong.
> >
> > So you think that just because you mounted the filesystem somewhere else
> > it should look different? This is what sharing is all about. If you share
> > a filesystem you also share the removal of objects.
> 
> No. At least I don't. 
> 
> Usage case: I heavily depend on using union mounts in diskless nfs setups, 
> since it drops the amount of administration of many systems _near_ one. It 
> boils down on installing the distribution of your choice in a directory, 
> union mount it ro, overlayed with a node private one (doing this in initrd 
> on the client for several reasons),

You're not sharing the rw layer so it's a different scenario, and will not
have the problem I'm talking about. See my other post [1] for exact scenario
where storing whiteouts on a branch would cause problems.

> add a little boot and automatic setup 
> machinery and be done. Since all changes are persistant, any system can be 
> set up individually, and still mostly only one tree is needed to keep up to 
> date.. Being in production in an office environment since two years without 
> major hassle (*).

Unionfs is used by many people in this way.

Josef 'Jeff' Sipek.

[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/31/365

-- 
Intellectuals solve problems; geniuses prevent them
		- Albert Einstein

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-01 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-30 16:13 [RFC 00/26] VFS based Union Mount (V2) Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 01/26] [PATCH 14/18] shmem: convert to using splice instead of sendfile() Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 02/26] VFS: Export dput_path() and path_to_nameidata() Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 03/26] VFS: Make lookup_hash() return a struct path Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 04/26] VFS: Make lookup_create() " Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 05/26] VFS: cache_lookup() cleanup Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 06/26] VFS: Make real_lookup() return a struct path Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 07/26] VFS: Introduce dput() variante that maintains a kill-list Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 08/26] VFS: Export lives_below_in_same_fs() Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 09/26] linux/stat.h: Add the filetype white-out Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 10/26] VFS white-out handling Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 11/26] tmpfs white-out support Jan Blunck
2007-08-01 15:13   ` Hugh Dickins
2007-08-02  2:48     ` Matt Mackall
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 12/26] ext2 " Jan Blunck
2007-07-31  3:45   ` Theodore Tso
2007-07-31  7:44     ` Jan Blunck
2007-07-31  8:32       ` Andreas Dilger
2007-07-31  9:08         ` Jan Blunck
2007-07-31 10:53       ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-02 19:31         ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-31 16:36   ` Josef Sipek
2007-07-31 17:00     ` Jan Blunck
2007-07-31 17:11       ` Josef Sipek
2007-08-01 15:23         ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-08-01 18:44           ` Josef Sipek
2007-08-01 19:10             ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-08-01 19:33               ` Josef Sipek
2007-08-01 19:52                 ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-08-01 22:06                   ` Erez Zadok
2007-08-02 12:05                     ` Jan Blunck
2007-08-02 11:55                 ` Jan Blunck
2007-08-02 17:50                 ` Jörn Engel
2007-08-02 18:15                   ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2007-08-02  5:24             ` Ph. Marek
2007-08-02 12:12               ` Jan Blunck
2007-08-02 10:26         ` Jan Blunck
2007-08-01 10:00       ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2007-08-01 11:43         ` Josef Sipek [this message]
2007-08-01 18:01         ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-31 17:03     ` Mark Williamson
2007-07-31 17:16       ` Josef Sipek
2007-08-01 17:58     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-01 18:03       ` Josef Sipek
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 13/26] ext3 whiteout support Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 14/26] union-mount: Documentation Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 15/26] union-mount: Add union-mount mount flag Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 16/26] union-mount: Introduce union_mount structure Jan Blunck
2007-08-06  5:57   ` Bharata B Rao
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 17/26] union-mount: Drive the union cache via dcache Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 18/26] union-mount: Changes to the namespace handling Jan Blunck
2007-08-08 10:10   ` Bharata B Rao
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 19/26] union-mount: Make lookup work for union-mounted file systems Jan Blunck
2007-08-09  5:42   ` Bharata B Rao
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 20/26] union-mount: Simple union-mount readdir implementation Jan Blunck
2007-08-06 11:08   ` Bharata B Rao
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 21/26] union-mount: in-kernel file copy between union mounted filesystems Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 22/26] union-mount: white-out changes for copy-on-open Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 23/26] union-mount: copyup on rename Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 24/26] union-mount: dont report EROFS for union mounts Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 25/26] union-mount: Debug Infrastructure Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 26/26] union-mount: Debug code Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 18:23 ` [RFC 00/26] VFS based Union Mount (V2) Al Boldi
2007-08-02  6:49 ` Bharata B Rao
2007-08-02 10:17   ` Jan Blunck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070801114320.GA13223@filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu \
    --to=jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpj@urpla.net \
    --cc=jblunck@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®