From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1765362AbXHAOk3@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1765362AbXHAOk3 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:40:29 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756264AbXHAOkT
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:40:19 -0400
Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:39495 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752591AbXHAOkR (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:40:17 -0400
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 16:40:03 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CFS review
Message-ID: <20070801144003.GA19252@elte.hu>
References: <p734pkbyuu4.fsf@bingen.suse.de> <20070711174252.GA16793@elte.hu> <20070711211638.GE18767@one.firstfloor.org> <20070711214649.GK14435@v2.random> <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707111500210.20061@woody.linux-foundation.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707130415520.1818@scrub.home> <1184302024.6709.11.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707131728070.1817@scrub.home> <1184389456.6632.13.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708010439050.1817@scrub.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708010439050.1817@scrub.home>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12)
X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean
X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.0
X-ELTE-SpamLevel: 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no
X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7-deb
	-1.0 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:

> 	while (1)
> 		sched_yield();

sched_yield() is being reworked at the moment. But in general we want 
apps to move away to sane locking constructs ASAP. There's some movement 
in the 3D space at least.

	Ingo