From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761577AbXHFHYi (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 03:24:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756100AbXHFHYa (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 03:24:30 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:41701 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753668AbXHFHY3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 03:24:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:24:24 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tiny sched_getaffinity cleanup Message-ID: <20070806072424.GI5359@elte.hu> References: <200707300216.l6U2GZWP024428@devserv.devel.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200707300216.l6U2GZWP024428@devserv.devel.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -1.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Ulrich Drepper wrote: > Unless I'm missing something quite tricky here's another tiny cleanup. > The generated code is not affected (gcc is smart enough) but for > people looking over the code it is just irritating to have the extra > conditional. thanks, i've applied your cleanup to my tree. Ingo