From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "Joonwoo Park" <joonwpark81@gmail.com>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Simon Arlott" <simon@fire.lp0.eu>, "Pavel Machek" <pavel@ucw.cz>,
"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: fix pci device initialization fail after kexec (2.6.23-rc2). (Related to e1000 doesn't resume properly from standby)
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 20:48:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708062048.37160.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b25c3fa70708060850p26b7b3e6yb8a523a479c714c0@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday, 6 August 2007 17:50, Joonwoo Park wrote:
> 2007/8/6, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:
> > On Monday, 6 August 2007 15:42, Joonwoo Park wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > > I think that the pci_set_power_state() has bug.
> > > The specification says that some delays is required.
> >
> > And they are in place, AFAICS (from drivers/pci/pci.c):
> >
> > /* Mandatory power management transition delays */
> > /* see PCI PM 1.1 5.6.1 table 18 */
> > if (state == PCI_D3hot || dev->current_state == PCI_D3hot)
> > msleep(pci_pm_d3_delay);
> > else if (state == PCI_D2 || dev->current_state == PCI_D2)
> > udelay(200);
> >
>
> The problem is occurred when state is 'PCI_D0', so those codes can't cover it.
> But pci pm specification 5.4.1 says that when programmed to D0 the
> equivalent of a warm reset, delay for the duration of the D3hot to D0
> Uninitialized state
> transition (10ms) to pci signal drivers remain disabled is required.
Section 5.4.1 of PCI PM 1.1. spec is about D3_hot. Specifically, it says
that if a device in D3_hot is programmed to D0, it performs the equivalent of
a warm reset. IOW, this is supposed to happen if the current state is D3_hot
and the targed state is D0, which is covered by the code snippet above.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-06 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-06 13:42 Joonwoo Park
2007-08-06 14:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-06 15:50 ` Joonwoo Park
2007-08-06 17:18 ` Simon Arlott
2007-08-06 18:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2007-08-06 20:54 ` [linux-pm] " David Brownell
2007-08-07 4:30 ` Joonwoo Park
2007-08-07 13:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708062048.37160.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=joonwpark81@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=simon@fire.lp0.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®