mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "Joonwoo Park" <joonwpark81@gmail.com>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Simon Arlott" <simon@fire.lp0.eu>, "Pavel Machek" <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: fix pci device initialization fail after kexec (2.6.23-rc2). (Related to e1000 doesn't resume properly from standby)
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 20:48:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708062048.37160.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b25c3fa70708060850p26b7b3e6yb8a523a479c714c0@mail.gmail.com>

On Monday, 6 August 2007 17:50, Joonwoo Park wrote:
> 2007/8/6, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:
> > On Monday, 6 August 2007 15:42, Joonwoo Park wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > > I think that the pci_set_power_state() has bug.
> > > The specification says that some delays is required.
> >
> > And they are in place, AFAICS (from drivers/pci/pci.c):
> >
> >        /* Mandatory power management transition delays */
> >        /* see PCI PM 1.1 5.6.1 table 18 */
> >        if (state == PCI_D3hot || dev->current_state == PCI_D3hot)
> >                msleep(pci_pm_d3_delay);
> >        else if (state == PCI_D2 || dev->current_state == PCI_D2)
> >                udelay(200);
> >
> 
> The problem is occurred when state is 'PCI_D0', so those codes can't cover it.
> But pci pm specification 5.4.1 says that when programmed to D0 the
> equivalent of a warm reset, delay for the duration of the D3hot to D0
> Uninitialized state
> transition (10ms) to pci signal drivers remain disabled is required.

Section 5.4.1 of PCI PM 1.1. spec is about D3_hot.  Specifically, it says
that if a device in D3_hot is programmed to D0, it performs the equivalent of
a warm reset.  IOW, this is supposed to happen if the current state is D3_hot
and the targed state is D0, which is covered by the code snippet above.

Greetings,
Rafael


-- 
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-06 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-06 13:42 Joonwoo Park
2007-08-06 14:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-06 15:50   ` Joonwoo Park
2007-08-06 17:18     ` Simon Arlott
2007-08-06 18:48     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2007-08-06 20:54       ` [linux-pm] " David Brownell
2007-08-07  4:30       ` Joonwoo Park
2007-08-07 13:51         ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200708062048.37160.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=joonwpark81@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=simon@fire.lp0.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®