From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764270AbXHGFFW (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 01:05:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755065AbXHGFFK (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 01:05:10 -0400 Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.161]:9423 "EHLO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755005AbXHGFFI (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 01:05:08 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 158801 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 01:05:08 EDT From: Axel Reinhold Message-Id: <200708070504.l7754KIr004277@bongo.freakout.de> Subject: Re: Kernel Bug in 2.4.35 when compiled gcc>=4.2.0 and -march=c3 In-Reply-To: <20070806211631.GA14501@1wt.eu> To: Willy Tarreau Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 07:04:20 +0200 (CEST) CC: Segher Boessenkool , "H. Peter Anvin" , Axel Reinhold , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL123f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Logged: Logged by bongo.freakout.de as l7754KIr004277 at Tue Aug 7 07:04:20 2007 X-RZG-AUTH: lUESeo99iNzPSoEmsz8hSOHHL4mD896CIlAzdW8M7hBAattaCEuwS8jKioY= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org According to Willy Tarreau: > > >Well, top-level assembly is usually nasty. Setting the section in the > > >assembly statement as you said is probably the only thing you *can* do. > > I do not understand the details of the discussion, but isn't the fact, that there is more than one way for the compiler to produce "correct" code of the nasty statements, also a "timebomb" for other projects - especially for Linux 2.6? Axel