From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S940838AbXHIPji (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:39:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S939643AbXHIPj2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:39:28 -0400 Received: from smtp114.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.229.91]:35964 "HELO smtp114.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S939631AbXHIPj1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:39:27 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=BdsOVkPCM1+w6dqWlhJDyVTb4Pg04z1y2+ZBhJccm6bakL0NfM1OUEWpGhYf+bGy2R0xyDz6fl4hrl3+SovJnRXWFZft0N+YwXP8xFea5GCbUyLTExfETYOX0eShRJcR+cW6FdYSKp3vsWZ0M1XL5eQL5pY4fAHhhtpofGz7xyg= ; X-YMail-OSG: QEvO3W4VM1nlCSFG2GSVrDHfIx4tLu.tPSgwcUmsCNkkcg.sOl0kUX4Bxa3O7i9SFwbFZoz.fGAEmrNBWz5xuBFPHf2IcYpppEARgJ6ZyaRhHZog1ZL4ax8HMyfb.I0rsUEuS0n2aR13AQ-- From: David Brownell To: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c: make code static Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 08:39:27 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Adrian Bunk , i2c@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20070729145708.GL16817@stusta.de> <20070809110526.5c2c7d6c@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20070809110526.5c2c7d6c@hyperion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708090839.28257.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 09 August 2007, Jean Delvare wrote: > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_bus_type); > > This one was left exported on request by David Brownell. See this > discussion thread: > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/i2c/2007-March/000924.html Actually, that wasn't a request; it was me answering why I didn't put a particular comment there, as part of moving an existing export declaration up next to the symbol's definition. > I am personally fine with removing this export, as it can always be > added later if needed. Right, that's what various other busses do.