From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935459AbXHJOTS (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:19:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S938605AbXHJOS4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:18:56 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:37090 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S938387AbXHJOSy (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:18:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:18:41 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Roman Zippel Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , Mike Galbraith , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: CFS review Message-ID: <20070810141841.GA5473@elte.hu> References: <20070801150742.GA23670@elte.hu> <20070801175004.GA17936@elte.hu> <20070801190556.GA1199@elte.hu> <20070810054948.GA5908@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7-deb -1.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Roman Zippel wrote: > > Also, could you please send me > > the cfs-debug-info.sh: > > > > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/cfs-debug-info.sh > > > > captured _while_ the above workload is running. This is the third time > > i've asked for that :-) > > Is there any reason to believe my analysis is wrong? please first give me the debug data captured with the script above (while the workload is running) - so that i can see the full picture about what's happening. Thanks, Ingo