From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@x86-64.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: optionally show last exception from/to register contents
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:08:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070813130845.GA3406@bingen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46C05D91.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 12:33:05PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> if (cpu_has_ds) {
> unsigned int l1;
> --- linux-2.6.23-rc3/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c 2007-08-13 08:59:45.000000000 +0200
> +++ 2.6.23-rc3-x86-ler/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c 2007-08-07 10:42:55.000000000 +0200
> @@ -321,6 +321,13 @@ void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs
> unsigned int code_len = code_bytes;
> unsigned char c;
>
> + if (__get_cpu_var(ler_msr)) {
> + u32 from, to, hi;
> +
> + rdmsr(__get_cpu_var(ler_msr), from, hi);
> + rdmsr(__get_cpu_var(ler_msr) + 1, to, hi);
> + printk("LER: %08x -> %08x\n", from, to);
> + }
This seems racy -- AFAIK the MSR will record the last branch
before an interrupt too, and the trap handlers enable interrupts
before coming here.
Can't think of a good way to avoid that for page fault at least
without impacting interrupt latency or reading the MSR always.
The other thing is that this should use print_symbol()
> printk("\n" KERN_EMERG "Stack: ");
> show_stack_log_lvl(NULL, regs, (unsigned long *)esp, KERN_EMERG);
>
> @@ -360,6 +367,18 @@ int is_valid_bugaddr(unsigned long eip)
> return ud2 == 0x0b0f;
> }
>
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(u32, ler_msr);
> +int ler_enabled = 0;
> +
> +void ler_enable(void) {
> + if (__get_cpu_var(ler_msr)) {
> + u64 debugctl;
> +
> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR, debugctl);
> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR, debugctl | 1);
Better use checking_rd/wrmsrl and disable on fail -- often emulators
fake specific CPUs, but don't implement all debugging features.
> +static int __init ler_setup(char *s)
> +{
> + ler_enabled = 1;
> + return 1;
> +}
> +__setup("ler", ler_setup);
I don't think the option is very useful.
BTW I have a patch somewhere to save/report last branch on exception
too, but it never seemed suitable for mainline because of its
high overhead. If someone submitted a full BTS driver I would
be tempted though :)
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-13 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-13 11:33 Jan Beulich
2007-08-13 13:08 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-08-13 13:13 ` Jan Beulich
2007-08-13 14:21 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 16:45 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-13 15:05 ` Keith Owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070813130845.GA3406@bingen.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@x86-64.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®