From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>,
Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
cotte@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/2][KVM] guest time accounting
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:22:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708131622.27533.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46C06638.6010108@qumranet.com>
Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Avi Kivity:
> Laurent's patch gives the best of both worlds: on old 'top', you get
> guest time accounted as user time, while on new 'top' it is accounted
> separately. This is done by reporting user time as the sum of the real
> user time and guest time. A newer 'top' can subtract guest time from
> user time to get the correct statistic.
Yes that looks promising. If I recall correctly we had some strange top
behaviours when we introduced the steal time. Old top added the steal time to
idle. We should check that.
>
>
> > My implementation uses a similar mechanism like hard and softirq. So I
have an
> > sie_enter an sie_exit and a task_is_in_sie function - like irq_enter and
> > irq_exit. The main difference is based on the fact, that s390 has precise
> > accouting for irq, steal, user and system time, and therefore my patch is
> > based on architecture specifc code using CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNT.
> >
>
> Okay, so the code should be under that config option, and kvm should
> select it.
No hurry..that was specific to our implementation, not KVM :-)
Besided that, Ingo changed the accouting with his CFS scheduler, and I still
have to figure out how CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING can be properly integrated
in CFS.
Christian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-13 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-10 15:58 Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 8:01 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 8:13 ` Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 8:38 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 13:08 ` Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 13:22 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 14:19 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:26 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 14:37 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 20:40 ` Heiko Carstens
2007-08-19 9:32 ` List stripping out cc's (was: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/2][KVM] guest time accounting) Avi Kivity
2007-08-19 19:53 ` List stripping out cc's Jeff Garzik
2007-08-19 20:10 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:05 ` [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/2][KVM] guest time accounting Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 14:10 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:22 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2007-08-13 14:22 ` Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 14:30 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:41 ` Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 15:22 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 15:36 ` Laurent Vivier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708131622.27533.borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=Laurent.Vivier@bull.net \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®