From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@dev.mellanox.co.il>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@dev.mellanox.co.il>,
lenb@kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Richard Hughes <hughsient@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ACPI: thinkpad-acpi: change thinkpad-acpi input default and kconfig help
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:28:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070816122823.GH5684@mellanox.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070816122506.GA5081@khazad-dum.debian.net>
> Quoting Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ACPI: thinkpad-acpi: change thinkpad-acpi input default and kconfig help
>
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > I *can* make the compile-time option a module parameter, though. That
> > > wouldn't be much of a problem, and the compile-time option would select the
> > > default for that parameter, but it would be easier to override it at run
> > > time (you can already do it, but it requires reprogramming various driver
> > > parameters using sysfs and the input device IOCTLs).
> > >
> > > Would a module parameter address enough of your concerns? Kconfig would
> > > only set the default for that parameter, then...
> >
> > I really think modifying defaults it not a great idea.
> > What about adding a writeable module parameter?
> > Then new HAL would just write to /sysfs/module/thinkpad/parameters/interface_version to
> > switch to new behaviour.
>
> Nah. This thing regulates what the module has to do when it loads and inits
> the firmware,
This does not have to be at module load time, though, does it?
> and the whole point of the new behaviour is to get userspace
> to be as hands' off as possible, so that we can auto-tune things better
> in-kernel, without a need to worry about HAL and friends overwriting local
> admin configurations needlessly.
>
> I will probably have to do something like the strict versioned interfaces of
> wireless extensions, I think. It really is a case of a deprecation of
> current userland interfaces done sanely. Right now I am thinking about
> giving userland two kernel releases before I change the default interface
> level, and one to two years to remove the older ones.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-16 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <11868017142597-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br>
[not found] ` <11868017143582-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br>
2007-08-11 18:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-08-11 22:16 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-08-16 7:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-08-16 12:25 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-08-16 12:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2007-08-16 13:03 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070816122823.GH5684@mellanox.co.il \
--to=mst@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=hughsient@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®