From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1766010AbXHXGs6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:48:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750815AbXHXGsu (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:48:50 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:36675 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754714AbXHXGsu (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:48:50 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:48:48 +1000 From: Hugh Blemings To: Satyam Sharma Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux Kernel Development , Cell Broadband Engine OSS Development , Matt Mackall Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS Message-Id: <20070824164848.b771f037.hugh@blemings.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20070816211551.11839.patches@notabene> <1070816112100.12182@suse.de> <20070824162508.78f10666.hugh@blemings.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hiya Satyam, All, > > > [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS > > > > > > Cell Broadband Engine OSS Development is an > > > subscribers-only mailing list. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma > > > > > > [...] > > > > As per recent discussions... > > > > The list is moderated for SPAM prevention, messages from valid senders > > will be forwarded manually and their email added to the whitelist. > > > > I've changed the list config so that it no longer generates the > > "subscriber-only" notification. > > So ... if someone (!subscriber && !whitelisted) sends a message, it stays > put somewhere till you get to it and determine whether it is relevant or > not, and either (1) forward it on to the list if appropriate, or (2) drop > it if detected as spam. And no "notifications" are ever sent out to > genuine / well-meaning posters during this process. Right? Correct. I aim to check messages at least once a day, typically more like three or four times. There is a (increasingly brief it seems) period where I sleep so things may languish during that period, or if I've gone bush or some such :) Jokes aside, am in the process of getting someone in Europe to co-moderate so we've some redundancy. > > On this basis I recommended the patch be NAKd so that people aren't put > > off copying the list where appropriate. > > Fair enough, if my understanding (as mentioned above) is correct, then I > believe the patch achieved a greater purpose than what it was originally > sent out for! No prob, good result all round it seems. Cheers, Hugh