mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: chrisw@sous-sol.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove securebits
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:19:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070824211942.GA24478@vino.hallyn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070824210649.GG30705@stusta.de>

Quoting Adrian Bunk (bunk@kernel.org):
> It seems that since it was added in kernel 2.2.0 (sic) securebits 
> was never used.
> 
> This patch therefore removes it.

Actually IIUC Andrew Morgan had plans of making securebits per-process,
which would make them far more usable.

Now maybe he'd just as soon start with a clean slate...  Andrew?

-serge

> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
> 
> ---
> 
>  include/linux/sched.h      |    1 -
>  include/linux/securebits.h |   30 ------------------------------
>  kernel/capability.c        |    1 -
>  security/commoncap.c       |   34 ++++++++++++++--------------------
>  security/dummy.c           |   16 +++++++---------
>  5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
> 
> 30c1d49582d183ea4a7ee0ffd886dcd9e2344115 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 2b3c936..be2e9c4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ struct sched_param {
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
>  #include <linux/sem.h>
>  #include <linux/signal.h>
> -#include <linux/securebits.h>
>  #include <linux/fs_struct.h>
>  #include <linux/compiler.h>
>  #include <linux/completion.h>
> diff --git a/include/linux/securebits.h b/include/linux/securebits.h
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 5b06178..0000000
> --- a/include/linux/securebits.h
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
> -#ifndef _LINUX_SECUREBITS_H
> -#define _LINUX_SECUREBITS_H 1
> -
> -#define SECUREBITS_DEFAULT 0x00000000
> -
> -extern unsigned securebits;
> -
> -/* When set UID 0 has no special privileges. When unset, we support
> -   inheritance of root-permissions and suid-root executable under
> -   compatibility mode. We raise the effective and inheritable bitmasks
> -   *of the executable file* if the effective uid of the new process is
> -   0. If the real uid is 0, we raise the inheritable bitmask of the
> -   executable file. */
> -#define SECURE_NOROOT            0
> -
> -/* When set, setuid to/from uid 0 does not trigger capability-"fixes"
> -   to be compatible with old programs relying on set*uid to loose
> -   privileges. When unset, setuid doesn't change privileges. */
> -#define SECURE_NO_SETUID_FIXUP   2
> -
> -/* Each securesetting is implemented using two bits. One bit specify
> -   whether the setting is on or off. The other bit specify whether the
> -   setting is fixed or not. A setting which is fixed cannot be changed
> -   from user-level. */
> -
> -#define issecure(X) ( (1 << (X+1)) & SECUREBITS_DEFAULT ? 	\
> -		      (1 << (X)) & SECUREBITS_DEFAULT :		\
> -		      (1 << (X)) & securebits )
> -
> -#endif /* !_LINUX_SECUREBITS_H */
> diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c
> index 20914d8..d3696a9 100644
> --- a/kernel/capability.c
> +++ b/kernel/capability.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
>  #include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>  
> -unsigned securebits = SECUREBITS_DEFAULT; /* systemwide security settings */
>  kernel_cap_t cap_bset = CAP_INIT_EFF_SET;
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
> index ff87b80..ce8f686 100644
> --- a/security/commoncap.c
> +++ b/security/commoncap.c
> @@ -241,14 +241,12 @@ int cap_bprm_set_security (struct linux_binprm *bprm)
>  	 *  and permitted sets of the executable file.
>  	 */
>  
> -	if (!issecure (SECURE_NOROOT)) {
> -		if (bprm->e_uid == 0 || current->uid == 0) {
> -			cap_set_full (bprm->cap_inheritable);
> -			cap_set_full (bprm->cap_permitted);
> -		}
> -		if (bprm->e_uid == 0)
> -			bprm->cap_effective = true;
> +	if (bprm->e_uid == 0 || current->uid == 0) {
> +		cap_set_full (bprm->cap_inheritable);
> +		cap_set_full (bprm->cap_permitted);
>  	}
> +	if (bprm->e_uid == 0)
> +		bprm->cap_effective = true;
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -393,9 +391,7 @@ int cap_task_post_setuid (uid_t old_ruid, uid_t old_euid, uid_t old_suid,
>  	case LSM_SETID_ID:
>  	case LSM_SETID_RES:
>  		/* Copied from kernel/sys.c:setreuid/setuid/setresuid. */
> -		if (!issecure (SECURE_NO_SETUID_FIXUP)) {
> -			cap_emulate_setxuid (old_ruid, old_euid, old_suid);
> -		}
> +		cap_emulate_setxuid (old_ruid, old_euid, old_suid);
>  		break;
>  	case LSM_SETID_FS:
>  		{
> @@ -408,16 +404,14 @@ int cap_task_post_setuid (uid_t old_ruid, uid_t old_euid, uid_t old_suid,
>  			 *          if not, we might be a bit too harsh here.
>  			 */
>  
> -			if (!issecure (SECURE_NO_SETUID_FIXUP)) {
> -				if (old_fsuid == 0 && current->fsuid != 0) {
> -					cap_t (current->cap_effective) &=
> -					    ~CAP_FS_MASK;
> -				}
> -				if (old_fsuid != 0 && current->fsuid == 0) {
> -					cap_t (current->cap_effective) |=
> -					    (cap_t (current->cap_permitted) &
> -					     CAP_FS_MASK);
> -				}
> +			if (old_fsuid == 0 && current->fsuid != 0) {
> +				cap_t (current->cap_effective) &=
> +				    ~CAP_FS_MASK;
> +			}
> +			if (old_fsuid != 0 && current->fsuid == 0) {
> +				cap_t (current->cap_effective) |=
> +				    (cap_t (current->cap_permitted) &
> +				     CAP_FS_MASK);
>  			}
>  			break;
>  		}
> diff --git a/security/dummy.c b/security/dummy.c
> index 6999456..88bb1bc 100644
> --- a/security/dummy.c
> +++ b/security/dummy.c
> @@ -37,15 +37,13 @@ static int dummy_capget (struct task_struct *target, kernel_cap_t * effective,
>  			 kernel_cap_t * inheritable, kernel_cap_t * permitted)
>  {
>  	*effective = *inheritable = *permitted = 0;
> -	if (!issecure(SECURE_NOROOT)) {
> -		if (target->euid == 0) {
> -			*permitted |= (~0 & ~CAP_FS_MASK);
> -			*effective |= (~0 & ~CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_SETPCAP) & ~CAP_FS_MASK);
> -		}
> -		if (target->fsuid == 0) {
> -			*permitted |= CAP_FS_MASK;
> -			*effective |= CAP_FS_MASK;
> -		}
> +	if (target->euid == 0) {
> +		*permitted |= (~0 & ~CAP_FS_MASK);
> +		*effective |= (~0 & ~CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_SETPCAP) & ~CAP_FS_MASK);
> +	}
> +	if (target->fsuid == 0) {
> +		*permitted |= CAP_FS_MASK;
> +		*effective |= CAP_FS_MASK;
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-24 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-24 21:06 Adrian Bunk
2007-08-24 21:19 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2007-08-25  3:50   ` Andrew Morgan
2007-08-25 18:28     ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-27 15:09       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-08-27 15:17         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-27 15:28           ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-08-27 15:58             ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-28  7:20               ` Andrew Morgan
2007-08-28 14:38                 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-08-28 18:19                 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-08-30  0:51                   ` Andrew Morgan
2007-08-30 13:26                     ` Serge E. Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070824211942.GA24478@vino.hallyn.com \
    --to=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=morgan@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®