From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755277AbXH3EbV (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:31:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750699AbXH3EbN (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:31:13 -0400 Received: from [212.12.190.141] ([212.12.190.141]:32965 "EHLO raad.intranet" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751627AbXH3EbM (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:31:12 -0400 From: Al Boldi To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Designers and Builders (was: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases?) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:31:24 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200708300731.24413.a1426z@gawab.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk wrote > Tracking feature or implementation suggestions wouldn't make sense. > Consider e.g. that there are several people on linux-kernel who often > write what they think the kernel should do but who never write a single > line of code themselves. There's no value in tracking such stuff. There are designers, and there are builders. Can you tell me who is more important? Thanks! -- Al