From: FD Cami <francois.cami@free.fr>
To: Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@gmail.com>,
charles gagalac <charles.gagalac@gmail.com>,
daryll q <daryll_26m@yahoo.com.ph>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Hang in 2.6.23-rc5
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 11:37:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070908113746.d4fceb87.francois.cami@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0709030411510.31154@enigma.security.iitk.ac.in>
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 04:15:01 +0530 (IST)
Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >
> > Try this from net-2.6 tree:
> >
> > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> > @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static u32 tcp_rto_min(struct sock *sk)
> > struct dst_entry *dst = __sk_dst_get(sk);
> > u32 rto_min = TCP_RTO_MIN;
> >
> > - if (dst_metric_locked(dst, RTAX_RTO_MIN))
> > + if (dst && dst_metric_locked(dst, RTAX_RTO_MIN))
> > rto_min = dst->metrics[RTAX_RTO_MIN-1];
> > return rto_min;
> > }
>
> That's my impression as well. That's way too core/busy a codepath to
> have a bug in. As I said earlier, almost anybody testing -rc5 is sure
> to hit this within a few hours (probably less) -- sad, it greatly
> erodes from the usefulness of -rc5 as a release candidate.
For the record, I haven't been able to reproduce the lockup with this
patch.
Cheers
François
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-08 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-02 18:42 daryll q
2007-09-02 19:05 ` charles gagalac
2007-09-02 20:38 ` Alessandro Suardi
2007-09-02 21:26 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-02 21:29 ` FD Cami
2007-09-02 21:46 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-09-02 22:45 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-02 23:10 ` Alessandro Suardi
2007-09-03 6:39 ` Patrick Mau
2007-09-04 9:32 ` Romano Giannetti
2007-09-05 17:11 ` Jean Delvare
2007-09-05 22:02 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-08 9:37 ` FD Cami [this message]
2007-09-03 21:04 ` Robert Fitzsimons
2007-09-02 22:05 ` Richard Mittendorfer
2007-09-02 22:14 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-09-02 20:21 Andrew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070908113746.d4fceb87.francois.cami@free.fr \
--to=francois.cami@free.fr \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=alessandro.suardi@gmail.com \
--cc=charles.gagalac@gmail.com \
--cc=daryll_26m@yahoo.com.ph \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=satyam@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®