From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754748AbXIMLzq (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2007 07:55:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751826AbXIMLzj (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2007 07:55:39 -0400 Received: from hellhawk.shadowen.org ([80.68.90.175]:2569 "EHLO hellhawk.shadowen.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751453AbXIMLzj (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2007 07:55:39 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:55:21 +0100 From: Andy Whitcroft To: Mike Frysinger Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML , bryan.wu@analog.com Subject: Re: [patch] add some Blackfin specific checks to checkpatch.pl Message-ID: <20070913115521.GB5146@shadowen.org> References: <200708211829.59975.vapier@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200708211829.59975.vapier@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-SPF-Guess: neutral Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 06:29:59PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > Check for a few common errors in Blackfin-specific code wrt MMR loading in > assembly and doing core/system syncs. If we are going to pull arch specific things into checkpatch I think we need to make sure we are pretty specific about where we apply them. I am assuming these checks only make sense againt some files in the arch tree? -apw