From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.22.6: kernel BUG at fs/locks.c:171
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:22:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200709140722.58046.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1189749754.25045.10.camel@localhost>
On Friday 14 September 2007 16:02, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 09:51 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 September 2007 19:20, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > I've just seen this in dmesg on a AMD K7 / kernel 2.6.22.6 machine
> > > (config attached).
> > >
> > > Any ideas / which further information needed ?
> >
> > Thanks for the report. Is it reproduceable? It seems like the
> > locks_free_lock call that's oopsing is coming from __posix_lock_file.
> > The actual function looks fine, but the lock being freed could have
> > been corrupted if there was slab corruption, or a hardware corruption.
> >
> > You could: try running memtest86+ overnight. And try the following
> > patch and turn on slab debugging then try to reproduce the problem.
>
> OK so far I've run memtest86+ 1.40 from freedos for 8 hrs (v1.70 hung on
> startup) - nothing.
Thanks.
> Could this corruption be caused by a pci card/driver? I am asking as I
> am using a new dvb-t card (asus p7131) and the oops happened after 5 or
> 6 days of uptime just about a day after watching some movie (very bad
> reception/lots of errors).
It could be caused by that, definitely. slab debugging plus my earlier
patch may help to narrow it down. (or stress testing with / without the
dvb card in action).
> However this machine used to have uptimes of months before the dvb card
> was in there and the kernel version upgrade (don't know which version
> that was...).
>
> Anyway I am not sure if this is reproducible, but I will keep memtest
> running today and then proceed as you said...
OK. Don't put too much effort into memtest if it hasn't caught anything
by now -- it's really only exercising your CPU and memory, so even if it
is your video hardware, it probably won't find the problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-14 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-13 9:20 Soeren Sonnenburg
2007-09-12 23:51 ` Nick Piggin
2007-09-14 6:02 ` Soeren Sonnenburg
2007-09-13 21:22 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-09-15 9:47 ` Soeren Sonnenburg
2007-09-15 10:22 ` Soeren Sonnenburg
2007-09-16 8:15 ` Nick Piggin
2007-09-17 13:43 ` Soeren Sonnenburg
2007-09-24 20:21 ` Soeren Sonnenburg
2007-10-09 13:09 Tomasz Chmielewski
2007-10-09 14:12 ` Soeren Sonnenburg
2007-10-09 14:48 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200709140722.58046.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=kernel@nn7.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®