From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755318AbXI1TgW (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:36:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751636AbXI1TgN (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:36:13 -0400 Received: from stout.engsoc.carleton.ca ([134.117.69.22]:40776 "EHLO stout.engsoc.carleton.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752238AbXI1TgM (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:36:12 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:36:11 -0400 From: Kyle McMartin To: Heiko Carstens Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generic compat_sys_fallocate Message-ID: <20070928193610.GC24047@fattire.cabal.ca> References: <20070928181111.GF22182@fattire.cabal.ca> <20070929050610.GA8880@osiris.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070929050610.GA8880@osiris.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 07:06:10AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > These are not identical... the least and most significant parts seem to get > passed in a different way on little and big endian machines. > Maybe it would be worth to have something like compat_merge_64() which does > the right thing? > yeah, that's what i've just done. cheers, Kyle