From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752794AbXJAB2X (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:28:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751200AbXJAB2P (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:28:15 -0400 Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:37670 "EHLO grelber.thyrsus.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750757AbXJAB2O (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:28:14 -0400 From: Rob Landley Organization: Boundaries Unlimited To: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/x86_64/00-INDEX Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:28:09 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, LKML , vojtech@suse.cz References: <200709281944.02953.rob@landley.net> <20070930203503.GA9748@one.firstfloor.org> In-Reply-To: <20070930203503.GA9748@one.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709302028.09949.rob@landley.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 30 September 2007 3:35:03 pm Andi Kleen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:44:02PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > From: Rob Landley > > > > Add Documentation/x86_64/00-INDEX > > What's the point of this file? It's for http://kernel.org/doc/Documentation/ I have a script that converts each 00-INDEX files into an index.html file, and then uses that instead of just a directory listing. I'm trying to get complete coverage (a 00-INDEX file for each directory), although what I really need is no directories with _partial_ 00-INDEX files (because then using index.html instead of showing the directory listing would hide files). If you want this directory to be special and _not_ have a 00-INDEX file, that's fine by me. It screws up my 404 link checker, but I can hardwire in an exception for you... > > +boot-options.txt > > + - AMD64-specific boot options. > > The architecture is not called AMD64 under Linux. That line was cut and paste from the first line of boot-options.txt. If you'd like to suggest another description, I'm all ears and can update the patch to touch boot-options.txt at the same time. > > +mm.txt > > + - Memory layout of x86-64 (4 level page tables, 46 bits physical). > > I don't think such details as the 46 bit number should be in an index file. *shrug* Ok. Rob -- "One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code." - Ken Thompson.