From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753173AbXI3UfX (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:35:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752017AbXI3UfJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:35:09 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:42405 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751925AbXI3UfI (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:35:08 -0400 Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:35:03 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Rob Landley Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, LKML , andi@firstfloor.org, vojtech@suse.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/x86_64/00-INDEX Message-ID: <20070930203503.GA9748@one.firstfloor.org> References: <200709281944.02953.rob@landley.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200709281944.02953.rob@landley.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:44:02PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > From: Rob Landley > > Add Documentation/x86_64/00-INDEX What's the point of this file? > x86_64/00-INDEX | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > --- /dev/null 2007-04-23 10:59:00.000000000 -0500 > +++ Documentation/x86_64/00-INDEX 2007-09-28 19:40:56.000000000 -0500 > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ > +00-INDEX > + - This file > +boot-options.txt > + - AMD64-specific boot options. The architecture is not called AMD64 under Linux. > +mm.txt > + - Memory layout of x86-64 (4 level page tables, 46 bits physical). I don't think such details as the 46 bit number should be in an index file. -Andi