From: Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: kbuild devel <kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] kbuild: save ARCH & CROSS_COMPILE
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 10:37:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071009083743.GA22435@flower.upol.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071009041743.GA21552@uranus.ravnborg.org>
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 06:17:43AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> > What about, that this is the first ever prompt, that must be shown and
> > written to the .config?
> Two issues to fix before we can do this:
> 1) chocie values cannot have more than one prompt
what occupying all my time now is to try to make fast and easy (text/tty)
user interface, based solely on TERM=linux capability. It is such, but
deep in ncurses/lxdialog wrappers. Having more flexible TUI without
all past stereotypes is the major point in making any progress for
flexible configuration interface. Remember, how blind `select` hurts.
It does due to UI limitations in first place, IMHO.
> 2) We need to share much more Kconfig* between the individual architectures
> First step is to let all arch's use drivers/Kconfig
All syntax wars are over, now order is the second thing to achieve. Like
in x86 merge case, this is purely technical thing with a bit of manual
work after that. sed magic for (nearly any kind :) of textual processing
i can guarantee without (yet another) C (like fixdep.c, parts of
sumversion.c, etc.)
> Let's get the two items above solved then we can revisit adding arch selection
> to kconfig (where it belongs in the end).
> And neither require a rewrite of kconfig...
Since i try to do test driven development, it's more easy for me to
understand/fix/test today's things via making bits from scratch. Fresh
view can do more on debugging of the logic level also.
____
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-09 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-08 20:02 Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-08 20:50 ` Oleg Verych
2007-10-09 4:17 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-09 4:53 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-10-09 5:28 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-10-09 6:01 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-09 8:37 ` Oleg Verych [this message]
2007-10-08 21:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-08 21:20 ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2007-10-09 6:03 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-09 9:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-10-09 9:39 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-09 10:00 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-09 11:08 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-09 14:09 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-09 16:34 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-10-09 17:44 ` Jeff Dike
2007-10-10 2:35 ` Kristoffer Ericson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071009083743.GA22435@flower.upol.cz \
--to=olecom@flower.upol.cz \
--cc=kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®