From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] core dump: remain dumpable
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:25:07 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071011102507.GA101@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071011062730.19F774D026B@magilla.localdomain>
On 10/10, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> As far as I know, set_dumpable was only used in do_coredump for
> synchronization and not intended for any security purpose.
I don't understand why do_coredump() clears DUMPABLE too.
> This changes do_coredump to use a separate bit for its
> synchronization, so the "dumpable" bits remain the same.
> ...
>
> @@ -1727,7 +1727,8 @@ int do_coredump(long signr, int exit_code, struct pt_regs * regs)
> if (!binfmt || !binfmt->core_dump)
> goto fail;
> down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> - if (!get_dumpable(mm)) {
> + if (!get_dumpable(mm) ||
> + test_and_set_bit(MMF_DUMP_STARTED, &mm->flags)) {
> up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> goto fail;
Do we really need the new MMF_DUMP_STARTED flag? We are holding ->mmap_sem,
can't we check "mm->core_waiters != 0" instead?
Hmm. Actually, do we need any check? If another thread (or CLONE_VM task)
already started do_coredump(), we must see SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT when we take
->mmap_sem. In that case coredump_wait() does nothing but returns -EAGAIN.
> - set_dumpable(mm, 0);
Looks like this change is all we need, no? The only problem is that we
return -EAGAIN if we race with another thread (the current code returns 0),
but nobody checks the returned value.
What do you think?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-11 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-11 6:27 Roland McGrath
2007-10-11 10:25 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2007-10-11 10:34 ` Roland McGrath
2007-10-11 10:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-10-11 10:51 ` Roland McGrath
2007-11-12 3:13 ` Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071011102507.GA101@tv-sign.ru \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®