From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: "Deepak Gaur" <dgaur@cdotd.ernet.in>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: post_coreinitcall and module_init() in tty_io.c linux kernel 2.6.10
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:49:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071018094956.fc05dc14.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071018101047.M27270@cdotd.ernet.in>
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:41:06 +0630 Deepak Gaur wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am novice in field of linux device drivers. I have a small question regarding module
> _init() call in file drivers/char/tty_io.c. In this file there are two init calls mentioned
>
> (a) postcore_initcall(tty_class_init);
> (b) module_init(tty_init);
>
> The postcore_initcall is defined in include/linux/init.h as
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> /**
> * module_init() - driver initialization entry point
> * @x: function to be run at kernel boot time or module insertion
> *
> * module_init() will either be called during do_initcalls (if
> * builtin) or at module insertion time (if a module). There can only
> * be one per module.
> */
> #define module_init(x) __initcall(x);
>
> /**
> * module_exit() - driver exit entry point
> * @x: function to be run when driver is removed
> *
> * module_exit() will wrap the driver clean-up code
> * with cleanup_module() when used with rmmod when
> * the driver is a module. If the driver is statically
> * compiled into the kernel, module_exit() has no effect.
> * There can only be one per module.
> */
> #define module_exit(x) __exitcall(x);
>
> #else /* MODULE */
>
> /* Don't use these in modules, but some people do... */
> #define core_initcall(fn) module_init(fn)
> #define postcore_initcall(fn) module_init(fn)
> #define arch_initcall(fn) module_init(fn)
> #define subsys_initcall(fn) module_init(fn)
> #define fs_initcall(fn) module_init(fn)
> #define device_initcall(fn) module_init(fn)
> #define late_initcall(fn) module_init(fn)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> It's written in quoted text that "There can only be one per module". But in tty_io.c
> there are two; postcore_initcall also maps to module_init. Each call is using different
> init functions and both functions seems to be required to be executed for proper
> functioning of module.
First, note that tty_io.c cannot be built as a loadable module;
it is always built into the kernel build image (see
drivers/char/Makefile).
The quoted text really means "There can only be one module_init()
per loadable module." It does not apply to code that is built into
the kernel image proper. In fact, I count 105 source files that
contain >= 2 initcalls.
> So my query is
>
> (1) Which one of the two (postcore_initcall/module_init) get executed and when?
For code that is built into the kernel (i.e., not loadable modules),
the order of initcalls in defined in include/linux/init.h:
* This only exists for built-in code, not for modules.
*/
#define pure_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("0",fn,0)
#define core_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("1",fn,1)
#define core_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("1s",fn,1s)
#define postcore_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("2",fn,2)
#define postcore_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("2s",fn,2s)
#define arch_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("3",fn,3)
#define arch_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("3s",fn,3s)
#define subsys_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("4",fn,4)
#define subsys_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("4s",fn,4s)
#define fs_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("5",fn,5)
#define fs_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("5s",fn,5s)
#define rootfs_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("rootfs",fn,rootfs)
#define device_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("6",fn,6)
#define device_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("6s",fn,6s)
#define late_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("7",fn,7)
#define late_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("7s",fn,7s)
> (2) If both get executed does it not break the rule that a kernel module should have
> only one module_init() and one module_exit()?
That rule applies to loadable modules only. They can have only
one entry/init point (and zero or one exit point :).
---
~Randy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-18 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-18 10:04 Deepak Gaur
2007-10-18 10:11 ` Deepak Gaur
2007-10-18 16:49 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071018094956.fc05dc14.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=dgaur@cdotd.ernet.in \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome