From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753737AbXJVW5e (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:57:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751709AbXJVW5R (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:57:17 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:34327 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753222AbXJVW5P (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:57:15 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Mark Lord Subject: Re: Regression: 2.6.23-rc9 okay, 2.6.23.1 resume problems Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 01:13:25 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Linux Kernel , Thomas Gleixner References: <4712786B.3040009@rtr.ca> <200710170207.02732.rjw@sisk.pl> <471CAF88.2010806@rtr.ca> In-Reply-To: <471CAF88.2010806@rtr.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710230113.25667.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, 22 October 2007 16:11, Mark Lord wrote: > Rafael, > > What happens to the jiffies variable on resume from RAM, and from DISK? > Do we restore it to the value it had at suspend, > or just leave it be with whatever? > > The answer has to be "restore the value it had at suspend time", > but I figured I'd check here anyway. > > ?? Well, frankly, I've lost track of that recently, but it seems that we just use the pre-suspend jiffies (at least in the current -git). Thomas knows better, I guess. :-) Greetings, Rafael