From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752457AbXJWR0W (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:26:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752755AbXJWR0N (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:26:13 -0400 Received: from pasmtpb.tele.dk ([80.160.77.98]:60688 "EHLO pasmtpB.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752439AbXJWR0M (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:26:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:27:47 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Franck Bui-Huu , Ralf Baechle , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Discardable strings for init and exit sections Message-ID: <20071023172747.GB26345@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20071012174507.GA21193@uranus.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Arguably all the existing linker scripts should be made more consistent I > suppose. Currently all the {init,exit} annotations are handled separately > by each architecture, so this would be no exception. If you have a > proposal as to how to do it cleanly, people will certainly appreciate it. Patches appreciated. I have made many of the linekr scripts use same format now - so it is easier to see what is equal and can be consolidated. Sam