From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] RT: Clean up some of the push-rt logic
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:52:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071024135248.7960.54006.stgit@novell1.haskins.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071024134431.7960.41984.stgit@novell1.haskins.net>
Get rid of the superfluous dst_cpu, move the cpu_mask inside the search
function, and collapse the two redundant pick-next-rt() functions.
Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
---
kernel/sched.c | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
kernel/sched_rt.c | 44 --------------------------------------------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 821f115..de5fc1c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1471,9 +1471,10 @@ next_in_queue:
* Return the highest-prio non-running RT task (if task
* may run on this CPU):
*/
- if (!task_running(src_rq, tmp) &&
- cpu_isset(this_cpu, tmp->cpus_allowed))
- return tmp;
+ if (!task_running(src_rq, tmp)) {
+ if ((this_cpu == -1) || cpu_isset(this_cpu, tmp->cpus_allowed))
+ return tmp;
+ }
curr = curr->next;
if (curr != head)
@@ -1489,20 +1490,21 @@ static int double_lock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest);
#define RT_PUSH_MAX_TRIES 3
/* Will lock the rq it finds */
-static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(cpumask_t *cpu_mask,
- struct task_struct *task,
+static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task,
struct rq *this_rq)
{
struct rq *lowest_rq = NULL;
- int dst_cpu = -1;
int cpu;
int tries;
+ cpumask_t cpu_mask;
+
+ cpus_and(cpu_mask, cpu_online_map, task->cpus_allowed);
for (tries = 0; tries < RT_PUSH_MAX_TRIES; tries++) {
/*
* Scan each rq for the lowest prio.
*/
- for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, *cpu_mask) {
+ for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, cpu_mask) {
struct rq *rq = &per_cpu(runqueues, cpu);
if (cpu == this_rq->cpu)
@@ -1511,7 +1513,6 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(cpumask_t *cpu_mask,
/* We look for lowest RT prio or non-rt CPU */
if (rq->curr_prio >= MAX_RT_PRIO) {
lowest_rq = rq;
- dst_cpu = cpu;
break;
}
@@ -1519,7 +1520,6 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(cpumask_t *cpu_mask,
if (rq->curr_prio > task->prio &&
(!lowest_rq || rq->curr_prio < lowest_rq->curr_prio)) {
lowest_rq = rq;
- dst_cpu = cpu;
}
}
@@ -1535,7 +1535,7 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(cpumask_t *cpu_mask,
*/
if (unlikely(task_running(this_rq, task) ||
task_rq(task) != this_rq ||
- !cpu_isset(dst_cpu, task->cpus_allowed))) {
+ !cpu_isset(lowest_rq->cpu, task->cpus_allowed))) {
spin_unlock(&lowest_rq->lock);
lowest_rq = NULL;
break;
@@ -1566,21 +1566,18 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
struct rq *lowest_rq;
int dst_cpu;
int ret = 0;
- cpumask_t cpu_mask;
assert_spin_locked(&this_rq->lock);
- next_task = rt_next_highest_task(this_rq);
+ next_task = pick_rt_task(this_rq, -1);
if (!next_task)
return 0;
- cpus_and(cpu_mask, cpu_online_map, next_task->cpus_allowed);
-
/* We might release this_rq lock */
get_task_struct(next_task);
/* find_lock_lowest_rq locks the rq if found */
- lowest_rq = find_lock_lowest_rq(&cpu_mask, next_task, this_rq);
+ lowest_rq = find_lock_lowest_rq(next_task, this_rq);
if (!lowest_rq)
goto out;
diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index 546526b..9b677c1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -96,50 +96,6 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
return next;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
-static struct task_struct *rt_next_highest_task(struct rq *rq)
-{
- struct rt_prio_array *array = &rq->rt.active;
- struct task_struct *next;
- struct list_head *queue;
- int idx;
-
- if (likely (rq->rt_nr_running < 2))
- return NULL;
-
- idx = sched_find_first_bit(array->bitmap);
- if (idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO) {
- WARN_ON(1); /* rt_nr_running is bad */
- return NULL;
- }
-
- queue = array->queue + idx;
- next = list_entry(queue->next, struct task_struct, run_list);
- if (unlikely(next != current))
- return next;
-
- if (queue->next->next != queue) {
- /* same prio task */
- next = list_entry(queue->next->next, struct task_struct, run_list);
- goto out;
- }
-
- /* slower, but more flexible */
- idx = find_next_bit(array->bitmap, MAX_RT_PRIO, idx+1);
- if (idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO) {
- WARN_ON(1); /* rt_nr_running was 2 and above! */
- return NULL;
- }
-
- queue = array->queue + idx;
- next = list_entry(queue->next, struct task_struct, run_list);
-
- out:
- return next;
-
-}
-#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
-
static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
update_curr_rt(rq);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-24 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-24 13:52 [PATCH 0/9] RT: balance rt tasks v6 Gregory Haskins
2007-10-24 13:52 ` [PATCH 1/9] RT: push-rt Gregory Haskins
2007-10-24 13:52 ` [PATCH 2/9] RT: Fixes for push-rt patch Gregory Haskins
2007-10-24 13:52 ` Gregory Haskins [this message]
2007-10-24 13:52 ` [PATCH 4/9] RT: Add a per-cpu rt_overload indication Gregory Haskins
2007-10-24 13:52 ` [PATCH 5/9] RT: Wrap the RQ notion of priority to make it conditional Gregory Haskins
2007-10-24 13:53 ` [PATCH 6/9] RT: Maintain the highest RQ priority Gregory Haskins
2007-10-24 13:53 ` [PATCH 7/9] RT: Add support for low-priority wake-up to push_rt feature Gregory Haskins
2007-10-24 13:53 ` [PATCH 8/9] RT: CPU priority management Gregory Haskins
2007-10-24 13:53 ` [PATCH 9/9] RT: Cache cpus_allowed weight for optimizing migration Gregory Haskins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071024135248.7960.54006.stgit@novell1.haskins.net \
--to=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®