From: Prakash Punnoor <prakash@punnoor.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.6.24-rc1-gec3b67c1 broken reg. libata-sata_nv in non NCQ mode
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:11:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200710271011.53372.prakash@punnoor.de> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1391 bytes --]
Hi,
I cannot boot above kernel when I *disable* swncq support which got added in
sata_nv. Problem seems that some component thinks driver is in ncq mode while
it is not, as I see a queue depth of 31 instead of 0 on boot., ie I see
something like this:
ata1.00: 625142448 sectors, multi 1: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
though I disabled ncq.And then boot "hangs" at
sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 625142448 512-byte hardware sectors (320073 MB)
sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support
DPO or FUA
sda
while detecting partitions I guess. (Note, the boot messages are from ncq
enabled kernel, but look alike, at least regarding queue depth...) The kernel
doesn't really hang but tries detecting something while spitting out some
errors. I simply wasn't patient enough.
Anyway, I tried 2.6.23 with swncq patch on top, and here I don't have any
problems with swncq or w/o it. (NCQ depth also gets correctly reported). I
diffed the 2.6.23 patched driver with git one and they are nearly identical
excpet some ID changes, whcih don't affect me, es I have a MCP51 chipset. So
something in libata changed and got broken or sata_nv wasn't adopted for that
change.
HTH,
--
(°= =°)
//\ Prakash Punnoor /\\
V_/ \_V
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2007-10-27 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200710271011.53372.prakash@punnoor.de \
--to=prakash@punnoor.de \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®