From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756346AbXJ2BSK (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:18:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752564AbXJ2BR6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:17:58 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:35976 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752514AbXJ2BR5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:17:57 -0400 Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:17:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20071028.181759.148922611.davem@davemloft.net> To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <200710282351.56284.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200710282351.56284.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 23:51:55 +0100 > Subject : Settings to /proc/sys/net/ipv[46]/conf/all are not propagated. via sysctl too > Submitter : Serge van den Boom > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9224 > Handled-By : Hideaki YOSHIFUJI I am to understand, from a reply from Herbert Xu, that this issue has existed a long time, definitely since before 2.6.22, therefore it doesn't belong on the regression list. The bug reporter says something that drives me a little batty, which is probably what got this onto the regression list. He says "2.6.22 (not sure)" as the most recent kernel where the problem didn't occur. People should list no version at all if they don't know, otherwise we'll just get more bogons on the regression list.