From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755185AbXJ1XDf (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:03:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751293AbXJ1XD1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:03:27 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:60769 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751291AbXJ1XD0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:03:26 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Frans Pop Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:19:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org References: <200710282351.56284.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710290019.56862.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday, 28 October 2007 23:48, Frans Pop wrote: > The regression in process CPU usage display in top is still there: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9135 > > It's a regression from .22, not from .23, but I guess it should still be > listed. Well, my intention is to list the most recent regressions in these messages. Your regression is in the bugzilla, is marked as a regression and linked to the appropriate meta bug entry ... Well, perhaps I'll be able to send a "post 2.6.22 regressions" message with a longer list from time to time, but I can't promise that. Greetings, Rafael